Behaviour models: privacy issues and opportunities - e-Publishing Innovation Forum
Privacy issues, what privacy issue? Hugo Drayton, Chief Executive Officer of Phorm dismissed the privacy fears that have been levelled against his company even before it launches its behavioural advertising tool, writes Peter Williams…
Phorm – launch is soon– is just one example of how digital advertising is rapidly changing both the internet and the traditional world of advertising. The last few years has seen a tremendous growth in search and while it will continue to grow its share of the advertising, the market remains steady. The other area of advertising which is predicted to take off and which promises to be equally controversial is mobile: while there is no doubt it is coming it is still in its infancy and concerns remain over formats.
Behavioural advertising models, according to Drayton, are much misunderstood. The Phorm model is not sinister. It is an anonymous process which does not hold data. And it is a trend which is here to stay. Proof? Well the big IT companies (Google, Yahoo etc) are buying up specialist behavioural targeting companies so they must think there is something in the technology. And if you are still sceptical, would you have said two to three years ago that online advertising would have overtaken TV advertising? It has happened because of a multitude of factors but particularly because of the availability of the internet.
But while the internet continues to grow, the audience is no longer as homogenous as it was. Instead the audience is fragmenting and becoming harder to reach. So in a big and complex world, the idea of a technology which will send information to users depending on their previous interest sounds like an answer to an advertiser’s prayer. The internet currently has a long tail of small sites which are an unexploited commercial opportunity, but by using emerging technologies those backwaters are capable of bearing commercial fruit.
The Phorm model works by the ISP gathering data which publishers can tag via an exchange. It promises to offer a breadth and targeting opportunity which has not existed before.
Think of it, says Drayton, as a search engine for people.
One comment which may be of particular interest to information professionals is a final thought which Drayton left with the audience: if the Phorm models works for driving targeted and behavioural advertising on the internet, then it is perfectly possible that you can do the same for content. Drayton, an ex-newspaper man said he stood by the need for the editorial process (i.e. the editor making a judgement on what his or her readers want to see). But there may also be room for content sent to people determined by their previous search behaviour. The world of content and information may never be the same again.


David Tebbutt, Consultant & Columnist
Daniel Griffin, IWR Deputy Editor
Peter Williams, IWR Editor
interesting....
of course the The Phorm model uses deep Packet Inspection kit to unlawfully (in the Uk and EU law)intercept _all_ your datastream AND all the website owners copyrighted content you visit by directly planting this DPU kit on the other end of the ISP wire for no finantial benefits for users or non signed websites, some might say commercial piracy for profit.
google provide a full service and ask that you sign up and if you chose not to, then you can still benefit from anonymous searches they provide without any form of DPI inter ISP intercetion etc.
get inPhormed read this
http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/12/33632575-links-to-protest-possible-deployment-phorm.html
Posted by: david m | 08 May 2008 at 21:53
Please visit my blog:
http://www.mywebusage.com/
for my response to this article.
many thanks
Alex
Posted by: Alex | 08 May 2008 at 22:38
Phorm used to be a spyware company called 121 media which was responsible for PeopleOnPage which used one of the most malicious pieces of spyware of 2005 and 2006; namely the apropos rootkit which was a nightmare to uninstall. More here from the respected computer security company f-secure:
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00001420.html
This company should NOT be given any access to our internet clickstream. They haven't even had the transparency and honesty to admit their spyware past. All phorm have done is change their model from installing spyware on home users pc's to installing spyware servers on the Internet Providers network. Even if you opt out of receiving adverts its quite likely that nearly every web page you view will be mirrored to phorm servers sitting at the heart of the internet providers network.
I do not trust this spyware company. Neither should other readers.
Posted by: Stazi Phormistan | 09 May 2008 at 08:06
This business spyware model is not in the interests of any one axcept Phorm/121 media. Longterm it will even be bad news for ISPs shortsighted enough to go with it. Think carefully before it is blindly accepted. it is Orwellian nirvana. I personally will move to ANY isp that does not use it.
Posted by: Micky | 09 May 2008 at 11:15
"search engine for people" - Drayton
A search engine which goes where it's not wanted both on the user side of thing and by webmasters.
I can lock out Google and Co individually from my sites but not Phorm/WebWise unless I block *every* spider. Google and Co are also kept out of sensitive areas with a simple HTTP based password, Phorm/WebWise follow the user in. Not acceptable however there is no way around it, they will do what they want and damn the webmasters wishes.
Posted by: ConcernedWebmaster | 09 May 2008 at 12:06